Support CRUSH-like multi-level placement trees

trace-sqes
Vitaliy Filippov 2020-05-09 00:55:24 +03:00
parent aaa054e644
commit c26b6e1fc3
2 changed files with 76 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -376,6 +376,40 @@ function put_aligned_pgs(aligned_pgs, int_pgs, prev_int_pgs, keygen)
}
}
// Convert multi-level osd_tree = { level: number, id?: string, size?: number, children?: osd_tree }[]
// to a two-level osd_tree suitable for all_combinations()
function flatten_tree(osd_tree, failure_domain_level, osd_level, domains = {}, i = { i: 1 })
{
for (const node of osd_tree)
{
if (node.level < failure_domain_level)
{
flatten_tree(node.children||[], failure_domain_level, osd_level, domains, i);
}
else
{
domains['dom'+(i.i++)] = extract_osds([ node ], osd_level);
}
}
return domains;
}
function extract_osds(osd_tree, osd_level, osds = {})
{
for (const node of osd_tree)
{
if (node.level >= osd_level)
{
osds[node.id] = node.size;
}
else
{
extract_osds(node.children||[], osd_level, osds);
}
}
return osds;
}
function all_combinations(osd_tree, count, ordered)
{
const hosts = Object.keys(osd_tree).sort();
@ -485,6 +519,7 @@ module.exports = {
pg_weights_space_efficiency,
pg_list_space_efficiency,
pg_per_osd_space_efficiency,
flatten_tree,
lp_solve,
make_single,

View File

@ -40,20 +40,55 @@ const osd_tree = {
},*/
};
const crush_tree = [
{ level: 1, children: [
{ level: 2, children: [
{ level: 3, id: 1, size: 3 },
{ level: 3, id: 2, size: 2 },
] },
{ level: 2, children: [
{ level: 3, id: 3, size: 4 },
{ level: 3, id: 4, size: 4 },
] },
] },
{ level: 1, children: [
{ level: 2, children: [
{ level: 3, id: 5, size: 4 },
{ level: 3, id: 6, size: 1 },
] },
{ level: 2, children: [
{ level: 3, id: 7, size: 3 },
{ level: 3, id: 8, size: 5 },
] },
] },
{ level: 1, children: [
{ level: 2, children: [
{ level: 3, id: 9, size: 5 },
{ level: 3, id: 10, size: 2 },
] },
{ level: 2, children: [
{ level: 3, id: 11, size: 3 },
{ level: 3, id: 12, size: 3 },
] },
] },
];
async function run()
{
// Test: add 1 OSD of almost the same size. Ideal data movement could be 1/12 = 8.33%. Actual is ~13%
// Space efficiency is ~99.5% in both cases.
let prev = await LPOptimizer.optimize_initial(osd_tree, 256);
LPOptimizer.print_change_stats(prev, false);
let res = await LPOptimizer.optimize_initial(osd_tree, 256);
LPOptimizer.print_change_stats(res, false);
console.log('adding osd.8');
osd_tree[500][8] = 3.58589;
let next = await LPOptimizer.optimize_change(prev.int_pgs, osd_tree);
LPOptimizer.print_change_stats(next, false);
res = await LPOptimizer.optimize_change(res.int_pgs, osd_tree);
LPOptimizer.print_change_stats(res, false);
console.log('removing osd.8');
delete osd_tree[500][8];
next = await LPOptimizer.optimize_change(next.int_pgs, osd_tree);
LPOptimizer.print_change_stats(next, false);
res = await LPOptimizer.optimize_change(res.int_pgs, osd_tree);
LPOptimizer.print_change_stats(res, false);
res = await LPOptimizer.optimize_initial(LPOptimizer.flatten_tree(crush_tree, 1, 3), 256);
LPOptimizer.print_change_stats(res, false);
}
run().catch(console.error);